Technology Addiction Through the Lens of Temperance
Published April 12, 2025
This is an example blog post written by AI. Don’t read into it too deeply :)
Technology Addiction Through the Lens of Temperance
Temperance—moderation in helpful things, abstinence from harmful things—stands as a cornerstone of Adventist health philosophy. As technology addiction reaches epidemic proportions, applying temperance principles offers both diagnosis of the problem and pathway to freedom. Understanding device dependence through the temperance framework reveals spiritual dimensions often missed in purely psychological analysis.
Biblical Temperance Foundations
Scripture consistently emphasizes self-control. Proverbs 25:28 warns: “Whoever has no rule over his own spirit is like a city broken down, without walls.” Galatians 5:22-23 lists self-control among the fruit of the Spirit. 1 Corinthians 9:25 speaks of athletes exercising temperance in all things.
Seventh-day Adventists have historically applied temperance primarily to alcohol, tobacco, and diet. Ellen White wrote extensively about these issues, recognizing that physical appetites affect spiritual health: “Indulgence of appetite is the greatest cause of physical and mental debility… Intemperance lies at the foundation of the moral depravity of the world” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 3, p. 485-486).
While she couldn’t have addressed smartphones or social media, her principles apply universally. If tobacco addiction undermines freedom and spiritual vitality, so does technology addiction. If alcohol’s mind-altering effects make it unsuitable for Christians, so do certain apps designed to hijack attention and manipulate behavior.
Technology Addiction as Intemperance
True addiction involves several characteristics, all of which apply to problematic technology use:
Compulsion: Unable to stop despite desire to do so. The person “just checks quickly” dozens of times daily, unable to leave devices alone.
Tolerance: Requiring increasing amounts to achieve the same satisfaction. Early social media users might have checked once daily; addicted users now check hundreds of times.
Withdrawal: Anxiety, irritability, or discomfort when separated from devices. Studies show physiological stress responses when heavy users can’t access phones.
Negative consequences: Continued use despite harm to relationships, work, health, or spiritual life. The addict recognizes damage but feels unable to change.
Loss of control: Using far more than intended. Planning to scroll for five minutes turns into an hour. Intending to check one thing leads to prolonged rabbit holes.
These markers of addiction reveal intemperance—lack of self-governance, appetites controlling the person rather than being controlled. The temperance solution, therefore, applies.
The Neuroscience of Digital Addiction
Understanding addiction’s physical basis doesn’t excuse it but does illuminate why temperance is difficult. Digital platforms exploit dopamine systems—the same neural pathways involved in drug addiction.
Dopamine drives reward-seeking behavior. When unpredictable rewards arrive (sometimes finding interesting content, sometimes not), dopamine circuits activate strongly—the same variable reward schedule that makes gambling addictive. Social media notifications provide this variable reinforcement constantly.
Additionally, infinite scroll, autoplay features, and algorithmic content curation eliminate natural stopping points. Traditional media had built-in endings—a book chapter ends, a TV show concludes. Digital platforms engineer endless consumption.
Ellen White recognized that physiological factors influence self-control: “When the brain is diseased, the whole being suffers” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 2, p. 347). Modern neuroscience confirms this—addictive technology literally changes brain structure, making temperance harder. Yet as with all sin, divine power can overcome biological predisposition.
Moderation vs. Abstinence
Temperance involves moderation in helpful things but abstinence from harmful things. This raises a key question: Is technology helpful (requiring moderation) or harmful (requiring abstinence)?
The answer varies by platform and person. Email, work software, and educational tools are genuinely helpful—moderation applies. Social media platforms designed to maximize “engagement” (addiction) may be inherently harmful for some users—abstinence might be necessary.
Ellen White applied this logic to substances: Coffee in moderation might be acceptable for some but should be avoided by those with specific health vulnerabilities. Similarly, someone who can check social media occasionally without compulsion might moderate. Someone who cannot limit use should abstain entirely.
Honest self-assessment is crucial. Many convince themselves they can moderate when they actually need abstinence. The question isn’t whether occasional use is theoretically possible but whether the individual actually controls their use or is controlled by it.
Practical Temperance Practices
Applying temperance to technology involves both environmental design and spiritual discipline:
Time limits: Setting and enforcing boundaries on daily usage. App-based timers, accountability partners, and scheduled offline hours create structure supporting temperance.
Content boundaries: Avoiding platforms or content types that trigger compulsive use. If infinite scroll is a weakness, use platforms without that feature. If video content leads to hours of watching, prefer text-based information.
Physical separation: Keeping devices in other rooms during focused work, meals, or sleep. Physical distance creates mental space, reducing compulsion.
Replacement activities: Filling time previously spent on devices with healthful alternatives—reading, exercise, hobbies, service. Temperance isn’t mere restriction but positive channeling of energy.
Accountability: Sharing struggles with trusted friends, asking for regular check-ins, and even allowing others to monitor usage if necessary. Pride prevents many from seeking help, but humility recognizes need for support.
Sabbath practice: Weekly 24-hour digital fast during Sabbath hours resets patterns and proves that life continues without constant connectivity.
The Spiritual Dimension
Ellen White recognized that intemperance isn’t merely physical but spiritual: “The controlling power of appetite will prove the ruin of thousands, when, if they had conquered on this point, they would have had moral power to gain the victory over every other temptation of Satan” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 3, p. 491-492).
Technology addiction similarly undermines spiritual life:
Prayer life suffers: Quick device checks replace quiet communion with God. Distracted minds cannot focus on prayer. Constant stimulation drowns out the “still small voice.”
Bible study deteriorates: Fragmented attention from device use makes sustained Scripture study difficult. Even digital Bible apps become doorways to distraction when notifications intrude.
Sabbath observance weakens: The rest and worship Sabbath offers get undermined by compulsive device checking, even if the content is ostensibly religious.
Witnessing becomes ineffective: Those enslaved to screens can hardly testify about freedom in Christ. The addiction itself discredits the message.
Character development stalls: Self-control is fruit of the Spirit. Technology addiction reveals and reinforces lack of self-control, creating downward spiral.
Victory over technology addiction, therefore, is deeply spiritual work—not mere behavior modification but character transformation through divine power.
The Role of Divine Power
Temperance might seem like merely human effort—willpower, self-discipline, behavioral strategies. Ellen White clarified that true temperance requires divine enabling:
“Pure air, sunlight, abstemiousness, rest, exercise, proper diet, the use of water, trust in divine power—these are the true remedies” (The Ministry of Healing, p. 127). Notice the final element: trust in divine power. All other remedies depend on this foundation.
Victory over technology addiction comes through:
Surrender: Acknowledging powerlessness over the addiction and submitting to God’s control. Just as alcoholics in 12-step programs recognize need for higher power, technology addicts must admit they cannot overcome alone.
Prayer for strength: Daily asking God for power to resist temptation, for one day (or hour, or minute) at a time.
Scripture memorization: Filling the mind with God’s word crowds out compulsive thoughts about devices. Verses on self-control become weapons against temptation.
Claiming promises: God promises victory over sin. Philippians 4:13, 1 Corinthians 10:13, and similar passages assure believers that divine power is available.
Daily dying to self: Crucifying the old nature with its appetites requires daily choice. Yesterday’s victory doesn’t guarantee today’s—ongoing surrender is essential.
Societal Temperance Witness
Just as Adventists historically advocated for alcohol prohibition and tobacco regulation (recognizing that individual temperance alone doesn’t address societal access to harmful substances), modern temperance advocacy might include:
Platform regulation: Supporting legislation limiting addictive design features, especially in apps targeting children.
Education: Teaching digital literacy, addiction awareness, and temperance principles in schools and churches.
Modeling alternatives: Demonstrating that meaningful life is possible without constant connectivity, offering counter-cultural witness.
Creating tech-free spaces: Establishing community environments where devices are prohibited, allowing practice of analog interaction.
This societal dimension doesn’t replace personal responsibility but recognizes that systemic factors enable or hinder individual temperance.
Conclusion: Freedom Through Temperance
Technology addiction represents one of the greatest temperance challenges facing the current generation. Platforms engineered to be addictive, cultural normalization of constant connectivity, and neurological vulnerability to digital dopamine create a perfect storm of intemperance.
Yet the same temperance principles that addressed 19th-century alcohol addiction and 20th-century tobacco dependence apply to 21st-century technology addiction. Moderation in helpful use, abstinence from harmful platforms, environmental design supporting self-control, accountability relationships, and—supremely—trust in divine power for victory.
Ellen White’s counsel remains timely: “The only safety for us is to stand as God’s free men and women… We are not to be brought into bondage by the habits and practices of the world” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 7, p. 53). Technology addiction is bondage. Temperance is freedom.
May Seventh-day Adventists lead in demonstrating this freedom. May we show the world that life abundant comes through self-control enabled by divine power, not through endless digital stimulation. May our temperance witness in this area, as in diet and substance use, point others toward the God who breaks every chain and sets captives free.
For more information about the Adventist health message and temperance principles, visit Adventist.org.