← GO BACK

Religious Liberty in the Age of Digital Surveillance

Published July 19, 2024

This is an example blog post written by AI. Don’t read into it too deeply :)

Religious Liberty in the Age of Digital Surveillance

Freedom of worship has long been considered a fundamental human right. Yet as digital surveillance becomes ubiquitous and governments gain unprecedented ability to monitor belief and practice, religious liberty faces new threats—precisely as biblical prophecy predicted. Understanding these developments through the lens of Adventist eschatology reveals both the danger and the appropriate response.

The Biblical Foundation for Religious Liberty

God Himself established the principle of religious freedom. Created in His image, humans possess the capacity to choose—to accept or reject divine authority. Throughout Scripture, God extends invitation, not compulsion. Joshua declared, “Choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve” (Joshua 24:15). Jesus wept over Jerusalem’s rejection but didn’t force compliance.

This principle extends to human governance. Revelation’s prophecies warn against powers that coerce worship—the beast demanding allegiance, the image speaking and causing death to dissenters. Forced religion characterized apostasy; true faith requires voluntary surrender.

Seventh-day Adventists have championed religious liberty since the denomination’s founding. Understanding that Sunday law enforcement will precipitate earth’s final crisis, Adventists recognize freedom of conscience as both biblical principle and practical necessity. The First Amendment’s religion clauses and similar protections worldwide have enabled Sabbath observance despite cultural pressure.

Now, digital technology creates capability to monitor and restrict religious practice in ways previously impossible. This development aligns with prophetic predictions of increasing persecution before Christ’s return.

The Surveillance Infrastructure

Modern surveillance operates at scales unimaginable a generation ago. Every digital action leaves traces: web searches reveal interests, social media posts display beliefs, geolocation data shows church attendance, communication metadata maps social networks, and purchases indicate religious practice.

Governments and corporations collect this data systematically. The NSA’s PRISM program, exposed by Edward Snowden, revealed mass surveillance of internet communications. China’s surveillance state monitors religious activity through facial recognition, internet monitoring, and social credit scoring. Even democratic nations maintain extensive data collection capabilities, justified by security concerns.

This infrastructure isn’t inherently religious persecution—yet. Most surveillance aims at terrorism prevention, criminal investigation, or advertising optimization. However, the tools exist to identify religious minorities, track their activities, and enforce restrictions. When Sunday laws pass, these tools will be readily available for implementation.

Current Examples of Digital Religious Persecution

China demonstrates digital surveillance’s potential for religious suppression. Facial recognition identifies underground church members. AI monitors online sermons for “unauthorized” teaching. Social credit systems penalize religious practice by restricting education, employment, and travel. WeChat surveillance detects religious discussions, triggering visits from authorities.

In Iran, internet monitoring identifies religious conversion from Islam. Encrypted messaging apps get blocked to prevent Christian evangelism. Website filtering blocks religious content. Digital surveillance identifies house church participants for arrest.

Even in Western nations, concerning precedents emerge. Social media platforms ban religious content deemed “hateful”—sometimes including traditional doctrine on marriage and sexuality. Employment discrimination against those with traditional religious views increases. Payment processors deny service to religious organizations with unpopular theology.

While these examples don’t yet constitute the systematic persecution prophecy describes, they establish both technological capability and cultural willingness to restrict religious expression. The foundation is being laid.

The Coming Sunday Law Crisis

Adventist prophetic interpretation understands that enforced Sunday observance will constitute earth’s final test. Ellen White wrote: “The substitution of the laws of men for the law of God, the exaltation, by merely human authority, of Sunday in place of the Bible Sabbath, is the last act in the drama” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 7, p. 141).

Digital surveillance will likely play a significant role in Sunday law enforcement. How might this occur?

Employment systems could automatically flag Sabbath-keeping employees as non-compliant with mandatory Sunday rest laws. Financial institutions could freeze accounts of those identified as Sabbath-keepers. Travel restrictions could prevent church attendance. Social media could be monitored for “dangerous” Sabbath doctrine, triggering legal consequences.

The efficiency of digital enforcement surpasses historical persecution. No need for informants when AI monitors communications. No need for physical searches when transaction data reveals behavior. No need for public trials when automated systems impose penalties.

This doesn’t mean technology determines outcomes—God’s sovereignty exceeds human technology. But awareness of these capabilities helps believers prepare practically and spiritually.

Privacy as Spiritual Discipline

In light of coming surveillance, privacy practices take on spiritual significance. Not paranoia, but prudent stewardship of information:

Limiting unnecessary data sharing reduces available information for potential persecution. Not every app needs location access. Not every website needs personal information. Declining optional data collection is wisdom.

Encrypted communication protects sensitive discussions. Adventists in restricted countries already use secure messaging to coordinate worship and share materials. Familiarity with these tools now may prove valuable later.

Cash transactions maintain some economic independence from digital tracking. While increasingly inconvenient, occasional cash use preserves options if digital access gets restricted.

Understanding privacy tools—VPNs, secure browsers, encrypted email—doesn’t indicate anything to hide. It reflects wisdom about living as a religious minority in an increasingly monitored world.

However, these practices cannot substitute for faithful witness. The goal isn’t to hide faith but to steward opportunities wisely.

The Proper Christian Response

Fear is not the appropriate reaction to surveillance and potential persecution. Jesus promised: “Do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul” (Matthew 10:28). Prophecy reveals coming challenges not to terrify but to prepare and reassure that God knows the future.

Boldness in witness: Despite surveillance risks, gospel proclamation continues. The early church preached boldly amid persecution. The Reformers published truth despite threat of death. Sabbath truth must be proclaimed clearly, regardless of cost. Surveillance may monitor, but it cannot silence those willing to speak.

Political engagement for religious liberty: While ultimate hope rests in Christ’s return, faithfulness includes defending liberty in the present. Supporting religious freedom legislation, educating about surveillance dangers, and advocating for privacy protections honor the principle of religious liberty. This advocacy isn’t fear-driven but principle-based.

Preparation for persecution: Jesus warned His followers to expect persecution (John 15:20). Preparation includes building deep Bible knowledge, developing unshakeable faith, cultivating Christian character, and forming supportive communities. When pressure comes—and prophecy says it will—these spiritual resources sustain faithfulness.

Trust in divine protection: The same God who shut lions’ mouths, delivered from fiery furnaces, and freed apostles from prison can protect His people amid digital surveillance. Protection may take unexpected forms—sometimes dramatic deliverance, sometimes strength to endure, always ultimate vindication.

Learning from the Past

History provides both warning and encouragement. Religious persecution has occurred repeatedly, often enabled by the era’s technology. The Roman Empire used its road and communication network to enforce emperor worship. The Inquisition used bureaucratic recordkeeping to track heretics. Nazi Germany used early computing to identify Jewish citizens.

Yet in every era, faithful believers endured. Some were martyred—their blood becoming seed for church growth. Others were preserved through miraculous intervention. All who remained faithful were ultimately vindicated.

The same will occur in the final crisis. Technology may enable unprecedented persecution, but God’s power exceeds all technological sophistication. No algorithm outsmarts the Omniscient. No surveillance system sees more than His eyes. No digital control surpasses His sovereignty.

Hope in the Return

Understanding digital surveillance’s threat to religious liberty could generate anxiety. But prophecy’s purpose is reassurance—God knows what’s coming and has it under control. The very fact that current technology enables previously impossible scenarios confirms prophetic accuracy and trustworthiness.

Revelation’s ending shows God’s people victorious, standing on the sea of glass with harps of God, singing the song of Moses and the Lamb. The surveillance state that seemed omnipotent is overthrown. The technologies used for persecution are forgotten. Only divine power remains.

This hope energizes faithful living now. If the outcome is certain, if Christ’s return is imminent, if vindication is promised, then present challenges—however sophisticated the surveillance—pale in significance. The momentary light affliction works an eternal weight of glory.

Conclusion: Faithful Whatever Comes

Digital surveillance creates unprecedented capacity for religious persecution. As Sunday law movements gain momentum, these tools may well be employed against Sabbath-keepers. The intersection of technology and prophecy becomes increasingly clear.

Yet this changes nothing about believers’ calling: faithfulness to God, courage in witness, wisdom in practice, and hope in Christ’s return. The same faith that sustained the early church amid Roman persecution, the Reformers amid papal persecution, and countless believers through all ages will sustain God’s end-time people.

May Seventh-day Adventists walk wisely in this digital age—neither na

ïve about dangers nor paralyzed by fear. May we steward privacy prudently while witnessing boldly. May we advocate for liberty vigorously while trusting divine sovereignty completely. And may we live each day prepared for Christ’s return, knowing that soon—very soon—all earthly surveillance will cease, and we’ll see our Savior face to face.


To learn more about religious liberty and Seventh-day Adventist beliefs, visit Adventist.org or contact your local Adventist church.

← GO BACK